zum Inhalt springen

Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin


Service-Navigation

    Publikationsdatenbank

    A comparison of different isolation methods for urine-derived epithelial cells in dogs and horses (2025)

    Art
    Poster
    Autoren
    Hollender, A.-C. (WE 17)
    Droessler, L. (WE 2)
    Trappe, S. (WE 2)
    Rausch, S. (WE 6)
    Ockler, T. (WE 2)
    Stage, H. (WE 17)
    Gehlen, H. (WE 17)
    Amasheh, S. (WE 2)
    Kongress
    IUPS 2025
    Frankfurt/Main, 11. – 14.09.2025
    Quelle
    Acta physiologica : official journal of the Federation of European Physiological Societies
    Bandzählung: 241
    Seiten: 326
    ISSN: 1748-1716
    Sprache
    Englisch
    Verweise
    URL (Volltext): https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/17481716/2025/241/S735
    DOI: 10.1111/apha.70105
    Kontakt
    Institut für Immunologie

    Robert-von-Ostertag-Str. 7-13
    14163 Berlin
    +49 30 838 51834
    immunologie@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    Introduction
    The culture of primary kidney epithelial cells usually involves tissue digestion after nephrectomy. Urinederived epithelial cells (UECs) offer a non-invasive source of urinary tract epithelial cells. To optimize yield and purity, isolation methods for equine and canine UECs were compared.
    Methods
    Urine samples from dogs (n = 74) were collected from spontaneous midstream urine. Equine samples (n = 21) were collected during general anesthesia induction through a routine urinary catheter. All urine samples were examined by dipstick, microbiological culture, and microscopy for crystals and cell density.
    Cells were seeded onto either gelatine- or Matrigel-coated (1:25) well plates and cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ for 14 days. Medium exchange and microscopic examination were performed daily. Cells were passaged at 80–100% confluence until cryopreservation or characterization.
    Results
    UECs were successfully cultured from 28.6% of equine urine samples. Gelatine-coating showed a 37.5% and Matrigel-coating a 25.0% success rate. Canine UECs were cultured in 8.1% of cases, with gelatinecoating showing a 4.6% and Matrigel-coating a 9.6% success rate. Bacterial or fungal contamination terminated 24.3% of canine and 19.1% of equine cultures. The addition of 0.1% Y-27632, 0.2% primocin, and 15% FBS to the culture medium showed the most promising growth.
    Conclusions
    Isolation of equine UECs using gelatine-coated wells and medium containing 15% FBS and 0.1% Y-27632 shows promising results. Isolation of UECs from dogs remains challenging due to contamination and nongrowth, requiring further optimization.