zum Inhalt springen

Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin


Service-Navigation

    Publikationsdatenbank

    The impact of low-fidelity three-dimensional-printed models of the equine distal limb and the canine forelimb in teaching veterinary anatomy in practical classes (2025)

    Art
    Zeitschriftenartikel / wissenschaftlicher Beitrag
    Autoren
    Schirone, Rebecca (WE 1)
    Schmedding, Maximiliane
    Weigner, Janet (WE 1)
    Werner, Martin (WE 1)
    Corte, Giuliano Mario
    Ehlers, Jan Peter
    Klass, Luise Grace (WE 1)
    Bahramsoltani, Mahtab (WE 1)
    Forschungsprojekt
    Untersuchung des didaktischen Potenzials gescannter und gedruckter 3D-Modelle in der veterinäranatomischen Lehre
    Quelle
    Animals
    Bandzählung: 15
    Heftzählung: 10
    Seiten: 1380
    ISSN: 2076-2615
    Sprache
    Englisch
    Verweise
    URL (Volltext): https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/15/10/1380
    DOI: 10.3390/ani15101380
    Kontakt
    Institut für Veterinär-Anatomie

    Koserstr. 20
    14195 Berlin
    +49 30 838 75784
    anatomie@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    Limited cadaver availability and health risks from formaldehyde-treated cadavers have increased the need for alternative learning materials in veterinary anatomy education. Two studies were conducted to investigate whether low-fidelity 3D-printed models provide comparable learning outcomes to real specimens. In study 1, veterinary students were assigned to two groups to study the equine distal limb on a real specimen (n = 67) or a 3D model (n = 68). In study 2, students were divided into four groups to study the canine forelimb on a real specimen (n = 44), a 3D model (n = 45), a 3D model followed by a real specimen (n = 47), or the reverse combination (n = 47). Learning outcomes were measured through a knowledge assessment. Afterwards, learning materials were evaluated by students. Both studies showed significantly higher learning outcomes in the groups learning with real specimens compared to other test groups. While students preferred to start learning with 3D models before switching to real specimens, this method had the lowest learning outcomes. However, students emphasized the value of 3D models for independent learning outside the dissection hall and desired further 3D models of other anatomical specimens. Findings indicated that low-fidelity 3D-printed models cannot replace real specimens but are a useful complementary tool in veterinary anatomy education.