zum Inhalt springen

Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin


Service-Navigation

    Publikationsdatenbank

    In vitro antibacterial activity of microbial natural products against bacterial pathogens of veterinary and zoonotic relevance (2024)

    Art
    Zeitschriftenartikel / wissenschaftlicher Beitrag
    Autoren
    Barth, Stefanie A.
    Preussger, Daniel
    Pietschmann, Jana
    Feßler, Andrea T. (WE 7)
    Heller, Martin
    Herbst, Werner
    Schnee, Christiane
    Schwarz, Stefan (WE 7)
    Kloss, Florian
    Berens, Christian
    Menge, Christian
    Quelle
    Antibiotics : open access journal
    Bandzählung: 13
    Heftzählung: 2
    Seiten: 135
    ISSN: 2079-6382
    Sprache
    Englisch
    Verweise
    URL (Volltext): https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/13/2/135
    DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13020135
    Pubmed: 38391521
    Kontakt
    Institut für Mikrobiologie und Tierseuchen

    Robert-von-Ostertag-Str. 7-13
    14163 Berlin
    +49 30 838 51843 / 66949
    mikrobiologie@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is considered one of the greatest threats to both human and animal health. Efforts to address AMR include implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs and introducing alternative treatment options. Nevertheless, effective treatment of infectious diseases caused by bacteria will still require the identification and development of new antimicrobial agents. Eight different natural products were tested for antimicrobial activity against seven pathogenic bacterial species (Brachyspira sp., Chlamydia sp., Clostridioides sp., Mannheimia sp., Mycobacterium sp., Mycoplasma sp., Pasteurella sp.). In a first pre-screening, most compounds (five out of eight) inhibited bacterial growth only at high concentrations, but three natural products (celastramycin A [CA], closthioamide [CT], maduranic acid [MA]) displayed activity at concentrations <2 µg/mL against Pasteurella sp. and two of them (CA and CT) also against Mannheimia sp. Those results were confirmed by testing a larger collection of isolates encompassing 64 Pasteurella and 56 Mannheimia field isolates originating from pigs or cattle, which yielded MIC90 values of 0.5, 0.5, and 2 µg/mL against Pasteurella and 0.5, 4, and >16 µg/mL against Mannheimia for CA, CT, and MA, respectively. CA, CT, and MA exhibited higher MIC50 and MIC90 values against Pasteurella isolates with a known AMR phenotype against commonly used therapeutic antimicrobial agents than against isolates with unknown AMR profiles. This study demonstrates the importance of whole-cell antibacterial screening of natural products to identify promising scaffolds with broad- or narrow-spectrum antimicrobial activity against important Gram-negative veterinary pathogens with zoonotic potential.