jump to content

Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin


Service-Navigation

    Publication Database

    Antimicrobial effect of a drinking water additive comprising four organic acids on Campylobacter load in broilers and monitoring of bacterial susceptibility (2022)

    Art
    Zeitschriftenartikel / wissenschaftlicher Beitrag
    Autoren
    Szott, Vanessa (WE 10)
    Peh, Elisa
    Friese, Anika (WE 10)
    Roesler, Uwe (WE 10)
    Kehrenberg, Corinna
    Ploetz, Madeleine
    Kittler, Sophie
    Quelle
    Poultry Science
    Bandzählung: 101
    Heftzählung: 12
    Seiten: Artikel 102209
    ISSN: 0032-5791
    Sprache
    Englisch
    Verweise
    URL (Volltext): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579122005053
    DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102209
    Pubmed: 36283144
    Kontakt
    Institut für Tier- und Umwelthygiene

    Robert-von-Ostertag-Str. 7-13
    14169 Berlin
    +49 30 838 51845
    tierhygiene@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    Application of organic acids via feed or drinking water is under discussion as a possible intervention strategy to reduce Campylobacter (C.) load in primary poultry production. A previous in vitro study showed that reduced concentrations of sorbic acid, benzoic acid, propionic acid, and acetic acid were required for antibacterial activity against Campylobacter when using a mixture of these 4 acids compared to when using the single acids. The present study aimed at determining the antibacterial efficiency of this combination in vivo as a drinking water additive for reducing shedding and intestinal C. jejuni colonization in broilers. Furthermore, we assessed whether the inoculated C. jejuni strain BfR-CA-14430 adapted in vivo to the applied organic acids. Results of this study showed that adding the organic acids consistently reduced Campylobacter loads in cloacal swabs. While significant reductions were observed within the entire study period, a maximum 2 log reduction occurred at an age of 18 d. However, after dissection at the end of the trial, no significant differences were detected in Campylobacter loads of cecal and colon contents compared to the control group. Susceptibility testing of re-isolates from cloacal swabs and cecal content revealed equal minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values compared to the inoculated test strain, suggesting that C. jejuni remained susceptible throughout the trial.