Königsweg 69
14163 Berlin
+49 30 838 62551 / 52790
lebensmittelhygiene@vetmed.fu-berlin.de / fleischhygiene@vetmed.fu-berlin.de
We studied the basis for a further harmonisation of meat inspection by comparing data from seven European countries through a mapping exercise. Focus was on the code systems used to register findings during meat inspection. Additionally, meat inspection data for slaughtered pigs from 2019 were collected from the same countries. This allowed us to compare the number of codes available, the frequencies of different findings and the terminology used. Codes with similar meaning were compiled. To elucidate the most common codes leading to total and to partial condemnation, two lists were created. The results showed huge variations between the systems, probably reflecting the historical development. Each system has its advantages and disadvantages. Still, the diverse terminology observed made it a challenge to compare data between countries. We suggest harmonising the terminology for meat inspection findings while respecting the national epidemiological situation, the local food safety culture, and the trade agreements in force. This will enable easy comparisons of data between abattoirs, regions, and countries.