zum Inhalt springen

Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin


Service-Navigation

    Publikationsdatenbank

    Students' acceptance of case-based blended learning in mandatory interdisciplinary lectures for clinical medicine and veterinary public health (2021)

    Art
    Zeitschriftenartikel / wissenschaftlicher Beitrag
    Autoren
    Duckwitz, Veronica (WE 16)
    Vogt, Lena (WE 16)
    Hautzinger, Claudia
    Bartel, Alexander (WE 16)
    Haase, Sebastian
    Wiegard, Mechthild (WE 11)
    Doherr, Marcus G. (WE 16)
    Quelle
    Vet record open
    Bandzählung: 8
    Heftzählung: 1
    Seiten: Artikel e14
    ISSN: 2052-6113
    Sprache
    Englisch
    Verweise
    URL (Volltext): https://bvajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/vro2.14
    DOI: 10.1002/vro2.14
    Pubmed: 34322277
    Kontakt
    Institut für Tierschutz, Tierverhalten und Versuchstierkunde

    Königsweg 67
    14163 Berlin
    +49 30 838 61146
    tierschutz@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    Background:
    In German veterinary education interdisciplinary lectures (ILs) are an important and mandatory part of the curriculum as their merging character builds a useful preparation for the future profession as a veterinarian. These lectures should enable students to work on practically-relevant and interdisciplinary cases, which should ideally be defined jointly by lecturers from different disciplines.

    Methods:
    In order to give students the opportunity to work on these cases and at the same time have contact with their lecturers and fellow students, the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, has converted its former in-class ILs (face-to-face delivery format) into a blended learning format. The mandatory lectures comprise 196 curricular hours and are delivered over the course of three semesters within the veterinary curriculum. The new concept was developed over a period of three academic years and extensively evaluated (old-new-comparison) with regard to its acceptance and compliance with national requirements for interdisciplinary teaching.

    Results:
    A total of 306 students were asked to evaluate different aspects of the newly implemented format. Overall, more than 79% of the students attending the newly implemented blended learning format responded positively, and the evaluation showed a significant improvement of learning motivation and acceptance when compared to the traditional teaching format.

    Conclusion:
    The results indicated that blended learning is a suitable option for teaching mandatory ILs in clinical medicine and veterinary public health.