zum Inhalt springen

Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin


Service-Navigation

    Publikationsdatenbank

    Sensitivity and specificity of a tail-activity measuring device for calving prediction in dairy cattle (2021)

    Art
    Zeitschriftenartikel / wissenschaftlicher Beitrag
    Autoren
    Voß, A. L. (WE 19)
    Fischer-Tenhagen, C. (WE 19)
    Bartel, A. (WE 16)
    Heuwieser, W. (WE 19)
    Quelle
    Journal of dairy science : JDS
    Bandzählung: 104
    Heftzählung: 3
    Seiten: 3353 – 3363
    ISSN: 0022-0302
    Sprache
    Englisch
    Verweise
    URL (Volltext): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022030220310894
    DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-19277
    Pubmed: 33358788
    Kontakt
    Institut für Veterinär-Epidemiologie und Biometrie

    Königsweg 67
    14163 Berlin
    +49 30 838 56034
    epi@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    Efficient calving surveillance is essential for avoiding stillbirth due to unattended dystocia. Calving sensors can help detect the onset of parturition and thus ensure timely calving assistance if necessary. Tail-raising is an indicator of imminent calving. The objective of this study was to evaluate a tail-mounted inclinometer sensor (Moocall Ltd., Dublin, Ireland) and to monitor skin integrity after sensor attachment. Cows (n = 157) and heifers (n = 23) were enrolled at 275 d post insemination, and a sensor was attached to each cow's tail. Investigators checked for signs indicating the onset of stage II of parturition, verified the position of the sensor, and evaluated the skin integrity of the tail above and below the sensor hourly for 24 h/d. We used 5 different intervals (i.e., 1, 2, 4, 12, and 24 h until calving) to calculate sensitivity and specificity. Sensors continuously remained on the tail (i.e., within 3 cm of the initial attachment position) after initial attachment until the onset of calving in only 13.9% of animals (n = 25). Sensors were reattached until a calving event occurred (51.6%) or the animal was excluded for other reasons (34.4%). In 31 animals the sensor was removed because the tail was swollen or painful. Heifers were significantly less likely than cows to lose a sensor but more likely to experience tail swelling or pain. Depending on the interval preceding the onset of parturition, sensitivity varied from 19 to 75% and specificity from 63 to 96%.