Publikationsdatenbank

Trends in interest of COVID-19 on Polish internet (2020)

Art

Zeitschriftenartikel / wissenschaftlicher Beitrag

Autoren

Jarynowski, Andrzej (WE 16)

Wójta-Kempa, Monika

Belik, Vitaly (WE 16)

Quelle

Przegla̜d epidemiologiczny : organ Panstwowego Zakladu Higieny i Polskiego Towarzystwa Epidemiologów i Lekarzy Chorób Zakaznych

Bandzählung: 74

Heftzählung: 2

Seiten: 258 – 275

ISSN: 0033-2100

Sprache

Englisch

Verweise

URL (Volltext): http://www.przeglepidemiol.pzh.gov.pl/pobierz-artykul?id=2320

DOI: 10.32394/pe.74.20

Pubmed: 33112108

Kontakt

Institut für Veterinär-Epidemiologie und Biometrie

Königsweg 67
14163 Berlin
+49 30 838 56034
epi@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

Abstract / Zusammenfassung

INTRODUCTION:
This study aims to investigate the social interest in SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in the Internet media during the epidemic in Poland and serves as a complement to longitudinal surveys monitoring public perception in real time.

METHODS:
We quantitatively analyzed "coronavirus" digital footprints on the Internet, in particular, on Google, Twitter, YouTube, Wikipedia and electronic media represented by EventRegistry, from 15.01 to 07.04.2020 (before and after official introduction of COVID-19 to Poland on 04.03.2020). We present results on trend analysis supported by statistical techniques.

RESULTS:
We identified six major temporal clusters of the interest on the topic COVID-19: 1) Chinese, 2) Italian, 3) Waiting, 4) Mitigations, 5) Physical distancing and Lockdown, 6) Anti-crisis shield. There was an exponential increase of the interest when the Polish government "declared a war against disease" around 11/12.03.2020 with a massive response activity. Later on, there was a decay in the interest with additional phases related to physical distancing and an anti-crisis legislation act associated with pronounced local peaks. We have found that declarations of response strategies by the Polish prime minister or the minister of health gathered the highest attention of Internet users. So already enacted or in force events do not affect the interest to such an extent. We have observed very weak or even negative correlations between a colloquial search term "antiviral mask" in Google, encyclopaedic definition in Wikipedia "SARS-CoV-2" as well as official COVID-19 incidence series, implying different mechanisms governing the search for knowledge, panic related behaviour and actual burden of COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS:
Traditional and social media do not only reflect reality, but also create it. Interest in COVID-19 (measured by topic intensity on the Internet) is unrelated to the officially notified viral pressure (measured by incidence) and probably physical risk of acquiring infection in Poland. As traditional media are ahead of social media in time, we advise to choose traditional news media for a quick dissemination of information, however for a greater impact, social media should be used. Otherwise public information campaigns might have less impact on society than expected.