zum Inhalt springen

Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin


Service-Navigation

    Publikationsdatenbank

    Impact of varying dietary concentrations of dried food residues on feed intake, apparent nutrient digestibility and fecal bacterial metabolites of adult dogs (2020)

    Art
    Vortrag
    Autoren
    Paßlack, N. (WE 4)
    Galliou, F.
    Manios, T.
    Zentek, J. (WE 4)
    Kongress
    24th ESVCN Congress
    München, 17. – 19.09.2020
    Quelle
    Congress Proceedings : 24th Congress of the European College of Veterinary and Comparative Nutrition : September 17 - 19, 2020 — Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (Hrsg.)
    München, 2020 — S. 116
    ISBN: 978-90-90-33625-1
    Sprache
    Englisch
    Verweise
    URL (Volltext): https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/190612/1/Congress_proceedings_2020_ffv_(4).pdf
    Kontakt
    Institut für Tierernährung

    Königin-Luise-Str. 49
    14195 Berlin
    +49 30 838 52256
    tierernaehrung@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    Introduction:
    The project “Food for Feed” (LIFE15 ENV/GR/000257) evaluates the use of dried food residues (DFR) from hotel catering in animal nutrition. The approach could contribute to a significant reduction of waste production and environmental burden by food waste, though legal restrictions are
    still a hurdle. In the present study, the use of DFR as a component for dog food was evaluated.

    Animals, materials and methods:
    Ten healthy adult dogs were fed a diet with varying amounts of DFR (0 %, 5 %, 10 % and 15 %). The food residues were collected in hotels in Crete, ground and solar-dried. The same batch of DFR (Table 1) was used as an ingredient for the experimental diets, which werenbased on poultry meal and rice flour. For the determination of apparent nutrient digestibility, titanium oxide was mixed to the diet at 0.2 %. The diets were fed for three weeks each. Daily amount of feed was calculated and weekly adjusted to maintain body weight (BW). Feed intake was recorded daily. At the end of each feeding period, fresh fecal samples were collected. Polynomial contrasts were calculated for group comparisons (GLM repeated measures; SPSS 22), with P < 0.05 as level of significance.

    Results and discussion:
    No adverse reactions related to the DFR were observed in the dogs. The daily amount of feed had to be increased at the highest dietary inclusion level of DFR in order to maintain BW of the dogs (Table 2). This might be probably attributed to the reduced apparent digestibility of crude protein and crude fat with increasing amounts of DFR in the diets. Fecal ammonia and L-lactate concentrations were not affected by the diets. Interestingly, the lowest amount of feed to maintain BW was required when the diet 5 % DFR was fed. Also, in this group, highest fecal D-lactate concentrations were measured.

    Conclusion:
    DFR might be a potential component of dog food, particularly at lower dietary inclusion levels (5 % or less).