zum Inhalt springen

Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin


Service-Navigation

    Publikationsdatenbank

    Computed tomographic evaluation of adjacent segment motion after ex vivo fusion of equine third and fourth cervical vertebrae (2020)

    Art
    Zeitschriftenartikel / wissenschaftlicher Beitrag
    Autoren
    Schulze, Nicole (WE 17)
    Ehrle, Anna (WE 17)
    Weller, Renate
    Fritsch, Guido
    Gernhardt, Jennifer (WE 17)
    Ben Romdhane, Racem (WE 16)
    Lischer, Christoph (WE 17)
    Quelle
    Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T
    Bandzählung: 33
    Heftzählung: 1
    Seiten: 1 – 8
    ISSN: 2567-6911
    Sprache
    Englisch
    Verweise
    URL (Volltext): https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0039-1693665.pdf
    DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693665
    Pubmed: 31387122
    Kontakt
    Pferdeklinik

    Oertzenweg 19 b
    14163 Berlin
    +49 30 838 62299 / 62300
    pferdeklinik@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    Objective: 
    Surgical fusion of vertebral segments is a treatment option for horses with cervical stenotic myelopathy or cervical fracture.
    Degenerative disease affecting adjacent vertebral segments is a reported complication following surgical vertebral fusion in other species, termed adjacent segment disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cervical vertebral fusion on the biomechanics of adjacent vertebral segments in the horse.

    Study Design: 
    Neck specimens of 12 horses were assessed using computed tomographic imaging. Range of motion (ROM) was determined by measuring the maximum sagittal flexion, extension and lateral bending between C2 and C5. C3/4 was subsequently fused using a standard locking compression plate and locking head screws and computed tomographic scans and ROM measurements were repeated.

    Results: 
    Prior to intervertebral fusion, a significant increase in ROM along the vertebral segments from cranial to caudal was observed. Range of motion measurements of C3/4 decreased significantly after fusion (p = 0.01).
    Range of motion of the adjacent segments (C2/3 and C4/5) did not change significantly after fusion.

    Conclusion: 
    Fusion of one cervical intervertebral joint did not affect the ROM of the adjacent vertebral segments. Further research investigating the implications of vertebral fusion on the intervertebral pressure in the equine patient is indicated.