zum Inhalt springen

Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin


Service-Navigation

    Publikationsdatenbank

    Diphenhydramine pharmacokinetics after oral and intravenous administration of diphenhydramine and oral administration of dimenhydrinate to healthy dogs, and pharmacodynamic effect on histamine-induced wheal formation:
    a pilot study (2019)

    Art
    Zeitschriftenartikel / wissenschaftlicher Beitrag
    Autoren
    Ehling, Sarah
    Bäumer, Wolfgang (WE 14)
    Papich, Mark G
    Quelle
    Veterinary dermatology : an international journal
    Bandzählung: 30
    Heftzählung: 2
    Seiten: 91 – e24
    ISSN: 0959-4493
    Sprache
    Englisch
    Verweise
    URL (Volltext): https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/vde.12727
    DOI: 10.1111/vde.12727
    Pubmed: 30779257
    Kontakt
    Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie

    Koserstr. 20
    14195 Berlin
    +49 30 838 53221
    pharmakologie@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    Histamine type-1 (H1) receptor antagonists such as diphenhydramine are frequently used for treatment of pruritus in dogs, yet therapeutic efficacy for allergic disorders is reported to be highly variable. Dimenhydrinate is a salt of diphenhydramine and 8-chlorotheophylline, and has been reported to produce superior oral absorption of diphenhydramine.

    To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of diphenhydramine in dogs after intravenous (1 mg/kg) and oral (5 mg/kg) administration, and when given orally as dimenhydrinate at a dose of 10 mg/kg (≈5 mg/kg diphenhydramine).

    Each drug was administered to six healthy, fasted mixed-breed dogs in a research facility, using a cross-over design.

    Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis of diphenhydramine and chlorotheophylline at defined intervals. Pharmacodynamic response was measured by histamine-mediated cutaneous wheal formation.

    There was great variability in the data and one dog was an extreme outlier. The mean systemic availabilities of diphenhydramine were 7.8% and 22.0% after oral administration of diphenhydramine and dimenhydrinate, respectively, whereas the mean maximum concentrations were 36 (± 20) and 124 (± 46) ng/mL. The terminal elimination half-lives of diphenhydramine and dimenhydrinate were 5.0 (± 7.1) and 11.6 (± 17.7) h, respectively. Plasma diphenhydramine concentrations did not correlate with the percentage reduction in histamine-induced wheal formation. Theophylline reached plasma concentrations considered to be therapeutic for dogs.

    Oral absorption of diphenhydramine was approximately three times greater with a longer half-life when it was administered as the combination product dimenhydrinate.