Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin


Service-Navigation

    Publikationsdatenbank

    Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms-Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany (2017)

    Art
    Zeitschriftenartikel / wissenschaftlicher Beitrag
    Autoren
    Hille, Katja
    Ruddat, Inga
    Schmid, Annette
    Hering, Johanna
    Hartmann, Maria
    von Münchhausen, Christiane
    Schneider, Bettina
    Messelhäusser, Ute
    Friese, Anika (WE 10)
    Mansfeld, Rolf
    Käsbohrer, Annemarie
    Hörmansdorfer, Stefan
    Roesler, Uwe (WE 10)
    Kreienbrock, Lothar
    Forschungsprojekt
    „Verbreitung von ESBL-/AmpC-bildenden Enterobakterien entlang der gesamten Masthähnchenkette: Schwachstellenanalyse und Bestimmung von Interventionspunkten“
    Quelle
    Preventive Veterinary Medicine; 142 — S. 39–45
    ISSN: 0167-5877
    Sprache
    Englisch
    Verweise
    DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003
    Pubmed: 28606364
    Kontakt
    Institut für Tier- und Umwelthygiene

    Robert-von-Ostertag-Str. 7-13
    Gebäude 35
    14169 Berlin
    Tel.+49 30 8385 1845 Fax.+49 30 83845 1863
    email:tierhygiene@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins and other beta-lactam antibiotics is of major concern for animal and human health. Knowledge of the prevalence of resistant bacteria in primary production is an important element to estimate transmission along the stages in the food production chain and the exposure of the human population. The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of cefotaxime-resistant commensal E. coli in dairy and beef cattle production units throughout Germany. Secondarily, the association between management factors and the presence of cefotaxime resistance was investigated. In total, 60 beef cattle and 52 dairy cattle production units all over Germany were included. Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli were isolated from at least one sample in 70% (95% CI: 58-83%) of the farms keeping beef cattle and 85% (95% CI: 75-94%) of the farms keeping dairy cattle. The sample prevalence was 35% (161/455; 95% CI: 31-40%) and 48% (156/323; 95% CI: 43-54%), respectively. Most factors associated with resistance to cefotaxime indicate that less intensive production results in a lower number of positive samples. For beef cattle, antimicrobial treatment of the whole animal group was significantly associated with an increased proportion of samples containing cefotaxime resistant E. coli. In addition, our results indicate that better hygiene management could improve the resistance situation on cattle farms.