Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin


Service-Navigation

    Publikationsdatenbank

    The prevalence and economic significance of Fasciola gigantica and Stilesia hepatica in slaughtered animals in the semi-arid coastal Kenya (2006)

    Art
    Zeitschriftenartikel / wissenschaftlicher Beitrag
    Autoren
    Mungube, E. O.
    Bauni, S. M.
    Tenhagen, B. A.
    Wamae, L. W.
    Nginyi, J. M.
    Mugambi, J. M.
    Quelle
    Tropical animal health and production; 38(6) — S. 475–483
    ISSN: 0049-4747
    Sprache
    Englisch
    Verweise
    Pubmed: 17243475
    Kontakt
    Tierklinik für Fortpflanzung

    Königsweg 65
    Haus 27
    14163 Berlin
    Tel.+49 30 838 62618 Fax.+49 30 838 62620
    email:fortpflanzungsklinik@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    Fasciola gigantica and Stilesia hepatica constrain ruminant productivity. The prevalence and economic losses caused by F. gigantica and S. hepatica in the ruminant production systems of Taveta division of Kenya were estimated in a retrospective appraisal of the slaughter records on the total number of animals slaughtered and livers condemned over the period 1989 to 2004. Only liver condemnations based on infestation by F. gigantica and S. hepatica were considered for purposes of this study. Liver condemnation rates differed significantly between bovines, caprines and ovines (p < or = 0.05) for F. gigantica (26%, 6.6% and 5.2%, respectively) and for S. hepatica (0.4%, 22% and 28%, respectively). The total loss through condemnation of both F. gigantica and S. hepatica infested livers was 4,408,272 KES (Kenyan shillings) (US dollars 72,272). The proportion of loss in bovines, caprines and ovines, was 76%, 17% and 7%, respectively. Fasciolosis contributed 3505410 KES (79.5%) and S. hepatica infestation 903,210 KES (20.5%) to the total losses due to liver condemnations. The authors feel strongly that there is a need for more work on the two parasites using live animals to determine the prevalence in animals of various ages, species and breeds and the economics of disease control at farm level.