Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin



    Technical note:
    comparison of rectal and vaginal temperatures in lactating dairy cows (2010)

    Zeitschriftenartikel / wissenschaftlicher Beitrag
    Vickers, L. A.
    Burfeind, O.
    von Keyserlingk, M. A. G.
    Veira, D. M.
    Weary, D. M.
    Heuwieser, W.
    Journal of Dairy Science; 93(11) — S. 5246–5251
    ISSN: 0022-0302
    DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3388
    Pubmed: 20965340
    Tierklinik für Fortpflanzung

    Königsweg 65
    Haus 27
    14163 Berlin
    Tel.+49 30 838 62618 Fax.+49 30 838 62620

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    A method commonly used to identify illness in dairy cows is measuring body temperatures with a rectal thermometer, but vaginal measures are becoming common in research. The primary objective of this study was to validate vaginal measures of body temperature by comparing them with rectal temperatures. Data loggers used to collect vaginal temperatures can be programmed to collect many readings per day, providing an opportunity to interpret effects of health in relation to diurnal differences in temperatures. Thus, a secondary objective was to compare the diurnal pattern in body temperatures for cows with and without retained placenta (RP). Body temperature was monitored for 8 d in 29 cows that had recently calved (enrolled 2 d after calving; 7 of these cows were diagnosed with RP) and in 13 cows in peak lactation (98±8 d in milk). Rectal temperatures were taken at 0630, 0930, 1230, 1530, 1830, and 2130h (±30 min) with a digital thermometer for 8 d consecutively. During the same period, vaginal temperatures were measured every 10 min with a microprocessor-controlled data logger attached to a modified vaginal controlled internal drug release insert. Values from the vaginal loggers were averaged over 1h and paired with the corresponding rectal temperature. There was a relationship between rectal and vaginal temperatures for fresh cows (n=1,393; r=0.81) and for peak-lactation cows (n=556; r=0.46). Cows with RP had higher body temperatures (39.2±0.01) compared with healthy cows (39.1±0.01). Body temperature was higher at night, and lower between 0800 to 1000 h for healthy cows (39.0±0.02) and between 1100 to 1300 h for RP cows (39.1±0.02). In summary, vaginal temperatures were associated with rectal measures, and provided the advantage of capturing dirurnal changes in body temperature.