zum Inhalt springen

Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin


Service-Navigation

    Publikationsdatenbank

    No evidence for active peptide transport in forestomach epithelia of sheep (2001)

    Art
    Zeitschriftenartikel / wissenschaftlicher Beitrag
    Autoren
    Martens, H
    Kudritzki, J
    Wolf, K
    Schweigel, M
    Quelle
    Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition : official journal of the European Society of Veterinary and Comparative Nutrition and the American Academy of Veterinary Nutrition
    Bandzählung: 85
    Heftzählung: 9-10
    Seiten: 314 – 24
    ISSN: 0931-2439
    Sprache
    Englisch
    Verweise
    Pubmed: 11686804
    Kontakt
    Institut für Veterinär-Physiologie

    Oertzenweg 19 b
    14163 Berlin
    +49 30 838 62600
    physiologie@vetmed.fu-berlin.de

    Abstract / Zusammenfassung

    The transport of peptides was studied with isolated preparations of rumen and omasum tissue of sheep by using the conventional Ussing-chamber method and isolated ruminal cells (REC). Mucosal addition of glycyl-L-glutamine, captopril (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor) or cefadroxil (beta-lactam antibiotic) did not change the short-circuit current (I(sc)), or tissue conductance (G(t)). The intracellular pH, pH(i), in isolated REC was not influenced by the addition of peptides to the buffer solution. These findings do not support the assumption of proton-coupled or electrogenic peptide transport. The determination of unidirectional flux rates of the peptide D-phenylalanyl-L-alanine (2,3-(3)H) showed that the flux rate in the serosal-mucosal direction, J(sm), was greater than J(ms), leading to a small net secretion of peptide. Transport was not significantly inhibited by the serosal addition of ouabain. Enhancing the paracelluIar permeability by an increase of osmotic pressure in the mucosal solution (FREYER and MARTENS, Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 8, 80, 1999) caused an increase of G(t) and significantly higher transport rates of peptide. The flux rates of peptides (in the nanomolar range) may therefore represent passive and possibly paracellular diffusion and are not of nutritional importance.